My initial idea for this post could be summed up in
the cliché: If I’d known then what I know
now. My list of pre-conceived notions about How Publishing Works is as long
as the proverbial piece of string.
In the early, heady days of securing a book deal, I thought I knew a lot of
things. How editing would be a matter of having my story checked over for
grammatical errors & perhaps shifting the odd scene or one. Even when I
understood the purpose of a copy editor, I still had some vague notion it also
had to do with ‘checking things’ – in some random, nothing-to-do-with-me sort
of way.
Lol, as they say…
Working on my first book was an enormous learning curve & soon disabused me
of many notions. In spite of the terror, I began to enjoy the editing process.
At heart, I’m a reviser & have never found it a chore to listen to my inner
critic. And formal editing has taught me to respect & be in awe of the professional
editorial side of creating a book.
Another preconceived notion of mine was, you get the cover you want &
nobody will question the title of your book. I am here to tell you, this is only
partly true. As someone published by an almost unique press that meets its
authors more than halfway, I’ve been inordinately lucky with my titles &
covers. There have been a few changes & tweaks but I love all of them. I
know there are authors still weeping because they hated the covers imposed on
them. I can’t imagine how that must feel & it took me a long time to learn
that in Big Press World, it is industry practice. Small presses rock, in more
ways than one!
For years I was a cover/title snob. All those books with ‘Girl’ in the title & all those girls, wandering off, away from the camera. I swore I would never, ever become part of that particular
club. I was yet to grasp the fact that it’s what happens in the bookshops that counts.
It’s shelf appeal, dear reader, pure & simple. (And there are copyright
reasons why so many girls & women on covers have their faces concealed. Apparently
it can cost more if the model’s face is visible.) Add the fact that readers prefer
to make up their own minds about how characters look & it all falls into place.
Back in April last year, I wrote this:
Like it or loathe it, Girl in the title of a contemporary novel, however ubiquitous, appears to sell books. As a woman who writes largely about women (albeit about girls as well), I have long eschewed reaching for the Girl word. And yet I find myself unexpectedly in love with a title I conjured several months ago for this story.
(You can read the entire post here.)
‘This story’ is my third book, Wild Spinning Girls. I’ve broken both the rules it seems, & gone plural, but for all the right reasons. The details are in that previous blog post. Suffice it to say, telling the story of Ida & Heather; discovering the title within the finished narrative, convinced me Girl is good. Girls is even better.
Here then is my new book with its lush cover. With its pretty title.

Such a wonderful cover and title – looks gorgeous and very tempting too! x
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, lovely. Honno do it again! xXx
LikeLike
I’ve been the person who has said ‘not under that title’ – because with non-fic, an arty, unclear title can kill a book.
I’ve been the person who got a cover they didn’t want and that truly did not serve the book, because people ding covers don’t always know what they’re doing, if it isn’t their genre, and you sadly can’t count on getting an excerpt. Eventually said person left the house and that greatly improved things and many people got their covers re-done.
Like you ‘girls’ makes me a bit uneasy, but the one I can’t bear is the book title that defines a leading female protagonist in relation to a man. The something or other’s wife. The man-with-a-job-description’s daughter. Those. At least the girls are allowed to be the focal point of their own stories!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting, Nimue.
As I said, it must frustrating to have a cover you really don’t like imposed on you. I’m lucky. Honno *do* know what they’re doing!
‘Girl/Girls’ doesn’t make me ‘uneasy’ as such. I did have reservations with it because it seemed to be everywhere. Now I understand how the industry works, I get it. Also, & crucially, writing WSG caused me to reevaluate my view about girl[s] vs woman. (If you read the post I linked to, I explain in more detail.)
As for the ‘leading female protagonist in relation to a man’ issue – I agree but again, it’s industry norm, particularly with the very popular historical/romantic saga genre. In a very competitive world, authors have little choice but to acquiesce. xXx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love love LOVE!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, cariad. Such a pretty one… xXx
LikeLike
This made me smile! I’ve had similar thoughts…
LikeLiked by 1 person
❤
LikeLiked by 1 person